Facilitation

Lets a group prioritize options with sticker dots, making preferences visible within minutes.

Core question: Which options merit further examination based on the group's independent preferences?

• 5-15 min
• 3-20

Arranges influence, interest, and relationships into a working map that makes engagement and risks transparent.

Core question: Which actor groups are affected or influential here, what assumptions apply, and how will they participate?

• 60–90 min
• 2-8

Condenses events into a chronological view of milestones, patterns, and dependencies.

Core question: Which supported events and turning points explain how the situation developed during the reviewed period?

• 30-90 min
• 2-12

Unfolds a central topic into branches, clusters, and open questions until relevant areas become selectable.

Core question: Which major areas, details and relationships belong to this central topic?

• 15-45 min
• 1-10

Prioritizes topics by voting and timeboxed discussion, so many points turn into clear action items.

Core question: Which topics matter to the people present now, and how should we use the available conversation time together?

• 30-90 min
• 3-20

Organizes session proposals, agenda, and self-led conversations that produce documentable learnings.

Core question: Which sessions do the people present want to offer and attend today so that shared learning emerges?

• Halber Tag bis 2 Tage
• 15-200

Deliberately switches between perspectives to gather decision inputs in a structured way and spot blind spots.

Core question: What becomes visible when we examine the same question in turn through information, feeling, value, caution, creativity and process control?

• 45-90 min
• 4-12

Sharpens goal, core message, and arc of tension so a narrative leads clearly to action or decision.

Core question: What should this audience understand from the story and decide next?

• 45-120 min
• 1-6

Compares three perspectives in a shared picture and makes overlaps as visible as differences.

Core question: Which elements belong to exactly one, two or all three sets?

• 15-45 min
• 2-8

Condenses individual ideas into clusters, themes, and priorities so consensus grows out of individual contributions.

Core question: What shared picture emerges from our different answers to the focus question?

• 1-3 h
• 5-30

Collects ideas silently, clarifies understanding, and lets the group prioritize, so quiet voices don't get lost.

Core question: Which change would most improve the handoff between support and engineering?

• 60-120 min
• 5-12

Sorts problems, reframes the top issue, and derives experiments that quickly turn frustration into movement.

Core question: Which most important problem will we address with which solution as the next experiment?

• 60-90 min
• 4-10

Ensures participation in turn, produces a broad idea list, and then leads it into clusters and a shortlist.

Core question: Which different ideas emerge when everyone receives an equal turn?

• 20-45 min
• 4-10

Clarifies group input, selection, and decision-making by framing the challenge, collecting questions only, and deriving new insights and next steps.

Core question: Which questions change how we understand and approach the challenge?

• 15-30 min
• 2-8

Makes accountability negotiable and visible, helping negotiate roles, expectations, and open questions cleanly.

Core question: Who owns each concrete result, and where are participation or escalation needed?

• 45-90 min
• 3-10

Makes goals, concerns, and open gaps visible so clarification steps can be planned deliberately.

Core question: Which statements are shared, where do goals or assumptions diverge, and what clarification follows?

• 1-2 h
• 4-12

Uses concept questions, votes, and peer discussion to measure understanding and deepen it together.

Core question: Which reasoning supports the answer, and how does understanding change after peer exchange?

• 10-20 min je Frage
• 6-50

Moves ideas from silent reflection through pair exchange into the group and condenses patterns.

Core question: Which ideas and experiences from everyone help with our concrete focus question?

• 10-20 min
• 4-100+

Gives one person precise peer feedback through three roles and records key next actions and observations.

Core question: What concrete help can two peers offer for a real challenge?

• 30-45 min
• 3-30

Enables self-organized sessions where the agenda, proceedings, and action topics emerge from actual need.

Core question: Which topics must participants put on the agenda themselves to act on the theme?

• 0.5-2 Tage
• 20-500+

Rotates small conversation groups so table notes, questions, and emergent themes are built on together.

Core question: Which patterns emerge when different perspectives connect the same questions across table rounds?

• 60-180 min
• 12-100+

Separates an inner and outer circle so discussion, observation, and tensions become visible at the same time.

Core question: How can a focused inner discussion gain diversity through visible observation and governed rotation?

• 45-90 min
• 8-80

Collects the starting situation, assumptions, and boundaries, and turns them into a precise problem statement.

Core question: Which concrete problem for which people in which context is evidenced, meaningfully bounded, and open to several solutions?

• 60-120 min
• 4-10

Moves group input, selection, and decision toward a concrete result through "collect stakeholders individually and by group", "explain power and interest", and "derive a strategy for each quadrant".

Core question: Who can affect the specific outcome, who is affected by it, and what form of engagement is appropriate?

• 30-60 min
• 2-8

Moves group input, selection, and decision toward a concrete result through "prepare the stakeholder list", "define power, legitimacy, and urgency", and "derive strategy by class".

Core question: Which stakeholder claims possess power, legitimacy, and urgency in this decision, and what attention follows?

• 60-90 min
• 3-6