Prepares stakeholders, core messages, and artifacts so architecture communication connects deliberately.
Core question: What system information must these recipients understand, examine or communicate onward?
CanvasMethod form: Canvas. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
60-120 min
2-8
Details
ArchitectureCategory: Architecture. Describes the method's domain of use.
Connects several views of large systems and keeps cross-view information for the overall picture.
Core question: Which views serve these stakeholders, and what must be documented beyond each view?
Planning toolMethod form: Planning tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-3 Tage
1-4
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Arranges influence, interest, and relationships into a working map that makes engagement and risks transparent.
Core question: Which actor groups are affected or influential here, what assumptions apply, and how will they participate?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
60–90 min
2-8
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Sharpens goal, core message, and arc of tension so a narrative leads clearly to action or decision.
Core question: What should this audience understand from the story and decide next?
Facilitation methodMethod form: Facilitation method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-120 min
1-6
Details
DeliveryCategory: Delivery. Describes the method's domain of use.
Defines audiences, channels, frequencies, and owners so relevant information reliably gets through.
Core question: Who needs which information when, from whom and through which feedback channel?
Planning toolMethod form: Planning tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-90 min
2-6
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Surfaces stakeholder expectations, clusters conflicts, and turns them into concrete agreements.
Core question: Which expectations, commitments, and observable signals must be clarified at this interface?
Facilitation methodMethod form: Facilitation method. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-90 min
3-12
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Makes goals, concerns, and open gaps visible so clarification steps can be planned deliberately.
Core question: Which statements are shared, where do goals or assumptions diverge, and what clarification follows?
Facilitation methodMethod form: Facilitation method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-2 h
4-12
Details
Systems ThinkingCategory: Systems Thinking. Describes the method's domain of use.
Sharpens an ambiguous problem situation through perspectives, transformation, and boundaries up to a root definition.
Core question: Which purposeful transformation makes sense under which worldview, who performs it, who experiences consequences, who can stop it, and which constraints apply?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-90 min
3-8
Details
DeliveryCategory: Delivery. Describes the method's domain of use.
Moves scope, sequence, and delivery flow toward a concrete result through "create a table for Risks, Assumptions, Issues, and Dependencies", "carry over initial entries from discovery and kickoff", and "archive resolved items instead of deleting them".
Core question: Which open Risks, Assumptions, Issues, and Dependencies threaten the next commitment, and who will do what by when?
Planning toolMethod form: Planning tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.AsyncFormat: async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30 min Setup, dann laufend
1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Moves group input, selection, and decision toward a concrete result through "collect stakeholders individually and by group", "explain power and interest", and "derive a strategy for each quadrant".
Core question: Who can affect the specific outcome, who is affected by it, and what form of engagement is appropriate?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30-60 min
2-8
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Moves group input, selection, and decision toward a concrete result through "prepare the stakeholder list", "define power, legitimacy, and urgency", and "derive strategy by class".
Core question: Which stakeholder claims possess power, legitimacy, and urgency in this decision, and what attention follows?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
60-90 min
3-6
Details
ArchitectureCategory: Architecture. Describes the method's domain of use.
Examines how architecture decisions support important quality goals and makes risks and trade-offs visible.
Core question: How does the architecture support our most important quality goals, and where do risks or trade-offs arise?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
Several meetings plus preparation and analysis; total effort depends on scope
Evaluation team, architects, and relevant stakeholders