Clusters notes into themes, statements, and opportunities, translating raw material into clear implications.
Core question: What patterns emerge from individual notes, which outliers matter, and what question follows?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45–90 min
3-10
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Asks its way step by step to a controllable cause and stops only once an effective countermeasure is within reach.
Core question: Which controllable cause behind the symptom can the team fix with a concrete countermeasure?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
15-30 min
2-6
Details
Systems ThinkingCategory: Systems Thinking. Describes the method's domain of use.
Layers events, patterns, structures, and mental models to find deeper causes and interventions.
Core question: Which conditions produce a recurring pattern, and which assumption keeps it in place?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30-60 min
2-10
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Sorts possible causes into categories and creates a shared picture for investigation and next tests.
Core question: Which possible causes and mechanisms could create this observed effect, and how will we test them?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30-60 min
2-8
Details
Decision MakingCategory: Decision Making. Describes the method's domain of use.
Shows which few causes carry the greatest effect and directs attention to the most important levers.
Core question: Which categories contribute most to the measured total burden?
Decision methodMethod form: Decision method. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30-60 min
1-6
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Clarifies workflows, data, causes, and improvements by framing the situation, analyzing the problem with is/is not, and planning risks and actions.
Core question: Do we need situation appraisal, cause analysis, a decision or safeguards for a plan?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-8 h
2-8
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Clarifies workflows, data, causes, and improvements by framing the problem precisely, branching possible causes, and defining countermeasures.
Core question: Which evidenced conditions explain the problem and which can we usefully change?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-3 h
2-8
Details
Systems ThinkingCategory: Systems Thinking. Describes the method's domain of use.
Clarifies connections, patterns, and leverage points by collecting undesirable effects, formulating causal links, and deriving interventions.
Core question: Which common causes can sufficiently explain the observed undesirable effects?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-6 h
3-8
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Clarifies workflows, data, causes, and improvements by defining scope and process, collecting failure modes, and assigning actions and owners.
Core question: How can a function fail, what effects follow and which actions demonstrably reduce risk?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-6 h
3-10
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Separates events, evidence, confirmed causes, and fitting actions so analysis does not turn into blame-finding.
Core question: Which evidenced system causes must change so this or a similar event does not recur?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-4 h
3-8
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Models a top event with AND and OR branches to make critical paths and causes visible.
Core question: Which individual or combined basic events are logically sufficient to produce the defined top event?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-6 h
3-8
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Compares an outlier with a stable case and filters out the differences that explain the deviation.
Core question: Which evidenced change distinguishes the event from a comparable incident-free situation, and what effect did it have?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-120 min
2-6
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Reconstructs a chain of events, marks factors, and derives verifiable causes and corrective actions.
Core question: Which events and conditions demonstrably contributed to the undesired outcome, and how are they linked in time and causality?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-6 h
3-10
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Coordinates team, immediate actions, root cause analysis, and prevention across eight steps to a verified solution.
Core question: How will we safely contain a material problem, permanently remove verified occurrence and detection causes, and prevent similar cases?
Process modelMethod form: Process model. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-6 Wochen
4-10
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Paired data points reveal whether two variables move together and where a suspected relationship needs deeper proof.
Core question: What pattern exists between X and Y, and which observations or groups need explanation?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30-90 min
1-4
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
A structured accident tree separates management controls, barriers, and events so serious incidents become auditable.
Core question: Which barrier, task, and management factors enabled or failed to prevent the event?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
Mehrere Tage bis Wochen
2-6
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Hazards, targets, and failed barriers are mapped so controls can be strengthened at the point of exposure.
Core question: Which barrier should interrupt the path, how did it fail, and which independent control is missing?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-4 h
2-6
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
A recurring incident pattern links related cases across time so systemic causes become visible beyond one event.
Core question: Which recurring condition connects related events, and which systemic action is missing?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.