Arranges components, relationships, and flows into a system picture that exposes dependencies and levers.
Core question: Which components are inside this system from the chosen perspective, and what remains in its environment?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-3 h
3-12
Details
FacilitationCategory: Facilitation. Describes the method's domain of use.
Arranges influence, interest, and relationships into a working map that makes engagement and risks transparent.
Core question: Which actor groups are affected or influential here, what assumptions apply, and how will they participate?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
60–90 min
2-8
Details
Decision MakingCategory: Decision Making. Describes the method's domain of use.
Pits driving and restraining forces against each other to deliberately derive change levers and interventions.
Core question: Which driving and restraining forces sustain the current state, and where can a responsible intervention work?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.LowComplexity: low. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-90 min
3-12
Details
Business StrategyCategory: Business Strategy. Describes the method's domain of use.
Clarifies starting point, opportunities, and strategic options by framing the scope and target state, capturing the seven elements, and deriving change actions.
Core question: Which inconsistencies among the seven elements prevent the intended outcome?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-4 h
3-12
Details
Decision MakingCategory: Decision Making. Describes the method's domain of use.
Connects observation, orientation, action, and feedback into a fast decision cycle.
Core question: Which action will we test from the current situation, and which feedback starts the next OODA cycle?
Process modelMethod form: Process model. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
15-60 min je Zyklus
1-8
Details
OperationsCategory: Operations. Describes the method's domain of use.
Compares an outlier with a stable case and filters out the differences that explain the deviation.
Core question: Which evidenced change distinguishes the event from a comparable incident-free situation, and what effect did it have?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
45-120 min
2-6
Details
Systems ThinkingCategory: Systems Thinking. Describes the method's domain of use.
Tests a planned change against desired effects and uncovers side effects, assumptions, and weak points.
Core question: Will the proposed injection causally produce desired effects, and which negative branches need protection before implementation?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2-4 h
3-8
Details
Systems ThinkingCategory: Systems Thinking. Describes the method's domain of use.
Links problem, target group, determinants, and actions into an actionable change program with evaluation.
Core question: How do we systematically translate an evidenced health or behaviour problem into theory- and evidence-based change objectives, intervention, implementation, and evaluation?
Process modelMethod form: Process model. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-5 Tage
4-12
Details
Systems ThinkingCategory: Systems Thinking. Describes the method's domain of use.
Moves relationships, patterns, and leverage toward a concrete result through "introduce the twelve leverage points", "collect planned actions", and "formulate a strategy across multiple levers".
Core question: At which place in the system can a small justified change sustainably influence behaviour?
Mapping toolMethod form: Mapping tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
Half day
3-12
Details
ArchitectureCategory: Architecture. Describes the method's domain of use.
Uses concrete tasks to show how well an architecture supports use and change.
Core question: What changes do our planned tasks require, and how do the architecture alternatives differ?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
Preparation, scenario analysis, and findings review; effort depends on scope
Architecture experts and stakeholders for scenarios and weighting