For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring.
Operations Mapping tool
Family Tree Analysis
Family tree analysis compares related events through shared causes, barriers, and conditions.
Family tree analysis groups similar events using a transparent relationship criterion and compares event chains. Recurring factors are derived only from evidenced commonalities.
Which recurring condition connects related events, and which systemic action is missing?
- Participants
- 2-6
- Time
- 2-4 h
Family Tree Analysis uses form an event family using fixed attributes and compare common causal and barrier patterns. Assessments remain justified and context-bound.

Define family
Define family
Define comparison criterion, horizon, and population.
Map events
Map events
Normalise chronology, conditions, barriers, and consequences for each event.
Compare patterns
Compare patterns
Compare commonalities, differences, and counterexamples.
Correct system
Correct system
Address the common cause or barrier gap and measure effectiveness.
Update after new evidence or a material context change and retain the previous version.
A good fit when
For several similar incidents, near misses, or quality deviations over time.
Ideal for
- Recurring incidents
- Pattern analysis across incidents
- Learning from near misses
- Combination with Causal Factor Analysis
Not good for
- One-off special cases unrelated to earlier events
- Pure technical detail analysis
- Quick operational fixes
Outputs

event family tree
event family tree with traceable sources, assumptions, and domain decisions.

Decision and review trail
Owners, dates, and next review for event family tree.
event family tree
Fictional worked example
form an event family using fixed attributes and compare common causal and barrier patterns as a precise working structure with a fictional example.
Family rule
Attribute · horizon · exclusion
Faulty data leave review; six months.
Event profile
Chain · conditions · barriers
Manual CSV; mandatory-field test missing.
Pattern
Commonality · n/N · counterexample
4/5 share transformation; one different cause.
Action
System change · exposure · effectiveness
Validator before export; errors per 100 exports.
The example demonstrates the domain logic of Family Tree Analysis; worksheets remain blank.
First step
Start with the core question: Which recurring condition connects related events, and which systemic action is missing?
Good to do first
Deep dive
Every event is traced back to its predecessors, triggers, and contributing factors. This produces a picture of recurring family resemblances instead of isolated individual cases. The structure helps recognize systemic patterns that are easily lost in individual reports.
Family Tree Analysis makes recurring incidents visible as related events instead of treating them in isolation. Triggers, precursors, and contributing conditions are compared across several cases. The method helps recognize shared patterns and derive systemic countermeasures.
Gather several comparable cases before claiming commonalities, and describe family traits as concretely as possible. The method gains strength when recurring patterns across events become clearer than the differences in the individual case. Close with a systemic theme, an observation indicator, and a hypothesis for the next check.
The method guide walks execution through 4 phases, timing, 4 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.
Open method guideYour perspective
Does this method help with your work?
Your feedback helps shape the next improvements to methodatlas.
Sources and topics
Family Tree Analysis: WorksheetPlan Family Tree Analysis around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.markdown
family-tree-analysis-working-template.md
Plan Family Tree Analysis around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.
Family Tree Analysis: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Full workshop Time: 90–180 minutes
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Event register, chronologies and causal analyses, taxonomy for comparison attributes, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
- Roles: Investigator · quality/safety analyst · process owner
- Advance information: Collect Event register, chronologies and causal analyses, taxonomy for comparison attributes in advance and mark open assumptions.
- Overall time needed: 90–180 minutes
- Setup: Prepare form an event family using fixed attributes and compare common causal and barrier patterns visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.
Prepare for the work steps
Define family: Define family
- Event register
- chronologies and causal analyses
- taxonomy for comparison attributes
Map events: Map events
- family rule
- chronologies and causal analyses
- taxonomy for comparison attributes
Compare patterns: Compare patterns
- event profiles
- chronologies and causal analyses
- taxonomy for comparison attributes
Correct system: Correct system
- pattern tree
- chronologies and causal analyses
- taxonomy for comparison attributes
event family tree
Family rule
Attribute · horizon · exclusion
...
Event profile
Chain · conditions · barriers
...
Pattern
Commonality · n/N · counterexample
...
Action
System change · exposure · effectiveness
...
Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.
U.S. Department of Energy: Accident Investigation Program
Define family: Define family
Expected artifact: family rule
family rule · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Can membership be decided reproducibly?
Map events: Map events
Expected artifact: event profiles
event profiles · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Do unknown data remain marked unknown?
Compare patterns: Compare patterns
Expected artifact: pattern tree
pattern tree · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Is the pattern supported by several independent events?
Correct system: Correct system
Expected artifact: system action
system action · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Does the action apply across the family?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/family-tree-analysis/run-sheet
Alternatives and neighbors
Fitting alternatives with decision guidance, followed by other related methods.

Instead of Family Tree Analysis, choose Causal Factor Analysis when you want to cleanly reconstruct an event chain with upstream influencing factors.

A structured accident tree separates management controls, barriers, and events so serious incidents become auditable.

Hazards, targets, and failed barriers are mapped so controls can be strengthened at the point of exposure.

Separates events, evidence, confirmed causes, and fitting actions so analysis does not turn into blame-finding.

Coordinates team, immediate actions, root cause analysis, and prevention across eight steps to a verified solution.

Clarifies workflows, data, causes, and improvements by defining scope and process, collecting failure modes, and assigning actions and owners.
Constraints and origin
Profile
- Method form
- Mapping tool
- Participants
- 2-6
- Time
- 2-4 h
- Maturity
- Emerging
- Origin
- Praxisgemeinschaft

