methodatlas
Product Strategy

ICE Scoring

Moves target group, value, goals, and priorities toward a concrete result through "prepare the idea backlog", "define scales for I, C, and E", and "select top ideas for testing or building".

Core question
Which ideas give us the highest learning rate per effort and which should we intentionally exclude?
LowWorkshop + async30-60 min
Purpose

Helps clarify target group, value, goals, and priorities in concrete terms. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list.

How it works

The team follows the steps "prepare the idea backlog", "define scales for I, C, and E", "score each idea", "multiply and sort", and "select top ideas for testing or building". Each step is made visible. At the end, an ICE table and top-ideas list are available so decisions, tests, or actions can continue directly.

Visual orientation

Method sketch for a quick mental model.

ICE Scoring · Fast Idea PrioritizationRoughly score ideas by Impact, Confidence, and Ease, multiply them, and choose the next test or build option
ICE ScoringThe visual shows an idea backlog, ICE scoring by Impact, Confidence, and Ease, and the resulting top idea.Make ideas comparable quickly enoughICE prioritizes roughly and transparently: impact, confidence, and ease become visible together.Idea backlogmake options roughly comparableScale 1-10explain Impact, Confidence, andEase consistentlyICE scoreboardIdeaICEScoreShorten onboarding876336Referral hook758280Dashboard tour589360Top ideahighest ICE score is testedfirstRough, not exactdiscuss differences, do not justaverage numbersscorequicklyI × C × Eselect bestcandidates

Flow

  1. 1Prepare the idea backlog
  2. 2Define scales for I, C, and E
  3. 3Score each idea
  4. 4Multiply and sort
  5. 5Select top ideas for testing or building

The runsheet guides execution with 4 phases, timeboxes, 6 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.

Open runsheet

Ideal for

  • Growth backlogs
  • Experiment pipelines
  • Quick reviews

Not good for

  • Strategic roadmap decisions

Deep dive

In detail

ICE Scoring comes from the growth-hacking world and was popularized by Sean Ellis, among others. The three dimensions are intentionally rough so that ideas can be compared quickly. ICE works well for idea backlogs and growth experiments, but it is less rigorous than RICE.

Facilitation

Define the scales in advance. Do not average away disagreement; discuss the differences instead.

Output artifacts
ICE-TabelleTop-Ideenliste
Tags
Artifact templates
ICE Scoring Working TemplateCompact working template for ICE Scoring with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.
markdown

ice-scoring-working-template.md

Compact working template for ICE Scoring with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.

ICE Scoring Working Template

Goal

Prioritizes ideas by Impact, Confidence, and Ease.

Context

When and for what do we use this method?

Input

Which data, observations, decisions, or materials are available?

Execution

Short notes along the runsheet.

Output artifacts

  • ICE table:
  • Top ideas list:

Assumptions and open questions

  • ...

Decision / next step

Owner, date, and success signal.

When to choose differently

Short decision aid for existing alternatives.

RICE Scoring

Statt ICE Scoring, wenn zusätzlich die Reichweite je Idee explizit in die Bewertung einfließen soll und mehr Vergleichsschärfe nötig ist.

Similar methods

All methods