Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence.
Delivery Decision method
Cost of Delay
Cost of Delay estimates economic loss per unit of time when an option becomes available later.
Cost of Delay is a time-dependent loss, not a generic business-value score. Profile, unit, horizon, assumptions, and range must remain visible.
What value is lost per week of delay, what is the loss profile, and which assumptions support the estimate?
- Participants
- 3-8
- Time
- 90-180 min
Cost of Delay uses a time-dependent delay-cost profile with unit, range, and critical dates. Assessments remain justified and context-bound.

Frame loss
Frame loss
Bound option, beneficiary, loss mechanism, and time unit.
Model profile
Model profile
Model linear, fixed-date, or expedited loss with deadlines and horizon.
Estimate range
Estimate range
Estimate drivers, unit, base value, and range per time unit.
Sequence options
Sequence options
Compare profiles over the actual delivery window and justify sequence.
Update profile and range when market, deadline, or demand changes.
A good fit when
Useful for sequencing decisions with real time effects; remain qualitative without credible drivers.
Ideal for
- Portfolio reviews
- Scaled Agile setups
- Investment committees
Not good for
- Very early discovery without a value assumption
Outputs

Cost of Delay profile
Cost of Delay profile with traceable sources, assumptions, and domain decisions.

Decision and review trail
Owners, dates, and next review for Cost of Delay profile.
Cost of Delay profile
Fictional worked example
a time-dependent delay-cost profile with unit, range, and critical dates as a precise working structure with a fictional example.
| Option | Option and effect | Profile | CoD per time | Assumptions | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract reportingWorked example | Contract reporting avoids service credits. | Fixed-date from 1 October. | €18k/week; €15–22k. | Contract clause; full rollout at delivery. | Reporting first if delivery slips beyond 1 October. |
1. Option and effect
- Contract reporting
- Contract reporting avoids service credits.
2. Profile
- Contract reporting
- Fixed-date from 1 October.
3. CoD per time
- Contract reporting
- €18k/week; €15–22k.
4. Assumptions
- Contract reporting
- Contract clause; full rollout at delivery.
5. Decision
- Contract reporting
- Reporting first if delivery slips beyond 1 October.
The example demonstrates the domain logic of Cost of Delay; worksheets remain blank.
First step
Start with the core question: What value is lost per week of delay, what is the loss profile, and which assumptions support the estimate?
Deep dive
For each initiative, value drivers and time lost are considered together and translated into a comparable order of magnitude. This couples prioritization to economics instead of leaving it hanging on gut feeling or loudness.
Cost of Delay, often abbreviated as CoD and popularized by Don Reinertsen, expresses how much the organization loses every week or month that an initiative remains unresolved. CoD can be estimated in absolute money terms or as relative profiles. The method forms the economic argument behind WSJF and is central in scaled Agile setups.
Allow relative size estimates instead of forcing false precision. Explain that CoD is rarely linear.
The method guide walks execution through 4 phases, timing, 4 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.
Open method guideYour perspective
Does this method help with your work?
Your feedback helps shape the next improvements to methodatlas.
Sources and topics
Cost of Delay: WorksheetPlan Cost of Delay around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.markdown
cost-of-delay-working-template.md
Plan Cost of Delay around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.
Cost of Delay: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Full workshop Time: 45–75 minutes
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Options and delivery windows, Value or loss drivers, Contract and deadline data, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
- Roles: Product/business · Finance · Sales/Operations · Delivery
- Advance information: Collect Options and delivery windows, Value or loss drivers, Contract and deadline data in advance and mark open assumptions.
- Overall time needed: 45–75 minutes
- Setup: Prepare a time-dependent delay-cost profile with unit, range, and critical dates visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.
Prepare for the work steps
Frame loss: Frame loss
- Options and delivery windows
- Value or loss drivers
- Contract and deadline data
Model profile: Model profile
- loss hypothesis
- Value or loss drivers
- Contract and deadline data
Estimate range: Estimate range
- CoD profile
- Value or loss drivers
- Contract and deadline data
Sequence options: Sequence options
- CoD range
- Value or loss drivers
- Contract and deadline data
Cost of Delay profile
| Option | Option · beneficiary · loss path | Shape · deadline · horizon | Unit · base · range | Source · uncertainty · dependency | Delivery window · cumulative loss · sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract reporting |
- Contract reporting: Worked example
Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.
Reinertsen: Principles of Product Development Flow
Frame loss: Frame loss
Expected artifact: loss hypothesis
loss hypothesis · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Is the path from delay to loss traceable?
Model profile: Model profile
Expected artifact: CoD profile
CoD profile · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Does the shape fit contract, demand, or risk?
Estimate range: Estimate range
Expected artifact: CoD range
CoD range · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Are assumptions and uncertainty visible beside the value?
Sequence options: Sequence options
Expected artifact: sequence decision
sequence decision · source · uncertainty · next decision
Entry:
...
- Was loss considered over the relevant delay duration?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/cost-of-delay/run-sheet
Alternatives and neighbors
Fitting alternatives with decision guidance, followed by other related methods.

Instead of Cost of Delay, choose WSJF when you want to balance priorities through cost of delay and job size.

Moves target group, value, goals, and priorities toward a concrete result through "prepare the idea backlog", "define scales for I, C, and E", and "select top ideas for testing or building".

Moves scope, sequence, and delivery flow toward a concrete result through "formulate the forecast question", "choose historical flow data", and "update the forecast regularly".

Defines audiences, channels, frequencies, and owners so relevant information reliably gets through.

Structures product work around shaped pitches, bets, fixed cycles, hill charts, and scope hammering.

Maps a service's path all the way to delivery and exposes wait times, waste, and bottlenecks.
Constraints and origin
Profile
- Method form
- Decision method
- Participants
- 3-8
- Time
- 90-180 min
- Maturity
- Established
- Origin
- Don Reinertsen

