methodatlas
Product Discovery

Fake Door Test

Turns customer problem, solution idea, and evidence into a tangible result by defining the hypothesis and target signal, shaping the fake door, and deciding what to learn next.

Core question
Does the measured demand at the fake-door entry clearly confirm the demand hypothesis above the predefined success threshold?
MediumAsync1-5 Tage
Purpose

The method helps clarify customer problem, solution idea, and evidence concretely. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as click data, interest signal, and learning decision.

How it works

The team follows the steps: define the hypothesis and target signal, design the fake door, drive traffic, measure clicks and reactions, and make a learning decision. Each step is captured visibly. At the end, click data, interest signal, and a learning decision are available so decisions, tests, or actions can follow directly.

Visual orientation

Method sketch for a quick mental model.

Fake Door Test · Demand MeasurementShow a not-yet-built feature, measure click interest, and translate it transparently into learning
Fake Door TestThe visual shows demand hypothesis, visible fake-door entry, click signal, transparent explanation, learning decision, and guardrails.Measure demand before the feature is builtA visible entry point provides behavioral data, but is transparently intercepted and ethically bounded.minimallyvisiblemeasure behaviorintercept transparentlyDemand hypothesiswho clicks what?Fake doorvisible button or menu itemClick signalCTR, segment, contextExplanationcoming soon, save interestLearning decisionbuild, change, or stopGuardraildo not deceive criticalworkflows

Flow

  1. 1Define the hypothesis and target signal
  2. 2Design the fake door
  3. 3Drive traffic
  4. 4Measure clicks and reactions
  5. 5Make a learning decision

The runsheet guides execution with 4 phases, timeboxes, 5 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.

Open runsheet

Ideal for

  • Feature Demand
  • Product Experiments
  • Growth Discovery

Not good for

  • Deceptive communication without transparency
  • Critical workflows

Deep dive

In detail

Fake Door Test follows a clear working logic: define the hypothesis and target signal, design the fake door, drive traffic, measure clicks and reactions, and make a learning decision. This turns the method into a visible thinking process rather than only a conversation. Participants move step by step from raw material, observations, or options toward a shared structure. The result is click data, interest signal, and a learning decision that make decisions, learning, or further planning actionable.

Facilitation

Prepare a clear guiding question, the right information, and a visible workspace. Plan about 1-5 days and use the format asynchronously. The method needs clear structure and preparation; short timeboxes, visible intermediate results, and a parking lot for open questions help.

Output artifacts
Click DataInterest SignalLearning Decision
Tags
Artifact templates
Experiment PlanShort plan for hypothesis, test design, success criteria, and decision.
markdown

experiment-plan-markdown.md

Short plan for hypothesis, test design, success criteria, and decision.

Experiment Plan

Hypothesis

We believe that ...

Target audience

Who are we testing for?

Test design

What exactly will participants or users do?

Success criterion

We count the test as positive if ...

Risks and limits

What can the test not prove?

Decision afterward

If positive: ... If negative: ...

Owner and date

...

When to choose differently

Short decision aid for existing alternatives.

Landing Page Test

Statt Fake Door Test, wenn du mit Landing Page Test Interesse an einem Angebot über eine konkrete Angebotsseite messen willst.

Similar methods

All methods