Helps clarify options, criteria, and risks in concrete terms. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.
Decision Rights Mapping
Moves options, criteria, and risks toward a concrete result through "identify key decision types", "collect roles", and "document and communicate the agreement".
Which role decides which type of decision, which roles are consulted before it, which are informed afterwards, and how do we make that binding?
The team follows the steps "identify key decision types", "collect roles", "assign Decide, Recommend, Input, and Inform for each decision", "discuss conflicts and overlaps", and "document and communicate the agreement". Each step is made visible. At the end, a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement are available so decisions, tests, or actions can continue directly.
Visual orientation
Method sketch for a quick mental model.
Flow
- 1Identify key decision types
- 2Collect roles
- 3Assign Decide, Recommend, Input, and Inform for each decision
- 4Discuss conflicts and overlaps
- 5Document and communicate the agreement
The runsheet guides execution with 5 phases, timeboxes, 5 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.
Open runsheetIdeal for
- Organizational design
- Mergers
- Crisis management
Not good for
- Very stable small teams
Deep dive
Decision Rights Mapping extends frameworks such as RACI, RAPID, or DACI with a deliberate inventory of the most important decision types in an organization or team. It makes implicit assumptions about authority visible and reduces recurring escalations. It is often used in organizational design and transformation programs.
Start with concrete decisions, not with roles. Avoid vague pseudo-agreements. Ask for explicit consent at the end.
Decision Rights Mapping Working TemplateCompact working template for Decision Rights Mapping with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.spreadsheet
decision-rights-mapping-working-template.md
Compact working template for Decision Rights Mapping with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.
Decision Rights Mapping Working Matrix
| Element | Description | Rating | Evidence | Owner | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 |
Output artifacts
- Decision-Rights Matrix:
- Agreement:
Decision or recommendation
What consequence follows from the matrix?
When to choose differently
Short decision aid for existing alternatives.
Statt Decision Rights Mapping, wenn ihr Verantwortlichkeiten entlang von Verantworten, Ausführen und Informieren sauber klären wollt.
Similar methods
All methodsTurns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by defining the decision, naming the driver and approver, and documenting decision and follow-up.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by delimiting the decision, assigning RAPID roles, and documenting the decision and action steps.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by framing the decision question, clarifying context and goals, and defining evidence needs and the next decision format.
Clarifies options, criteria, and risks by framing the central question, recording the main claim, and marking weak spots.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by collecting cases or challenges, explaining the Cynefin domains, and deriving the next actions.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by listing options, defining criteria, and checking result and sensitivity.