methodatlas
Agile

Working Agreements

Turns team flow, expectations, and delivery rhythm into a tangible result by clarifying work context, collecting expectations, and setting a review cadence.

Core question
Which concrete behavior expectations make collaboration easier, and which of them does the team want to commit to?
LowWorkshop45-90 min
Purpose

The method helps clarify backlog, sprint work, and team flow concretely. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery fit. The result is captured as working agreements, team norms, and a review cadence.

How it works

The team follows the steps: clarify the work context, collect expectations, formulate rules, get commitment, and set a review cadence. Each step is captured visibly. At the end, working agreements, team norms, and a review cadence are available so decisions, tests, or actions can follow directly.

Visual orientation

Method sketch for a quick mental model.

Working Agreements · Team Ground RulesCollect expectations, translate them into concrete agreements, commit jointly, and review regularly
Working AgreementsThe visual shows how work context and expectations become concrete agreements, commitment, and a review cadence.Translate collaboration into reviewable rulesExpectations become a few concrete agreements that the team visibly supports and maintains regularly.phrase concretelyteam confirmskeepaliveWork contextwhen collaboration becomesdifficultExpectationscollect desired behaviorAgreementsCommunicationchannel and response timeMeetingsagenda and outcomeQualitydone and reviewConflictdirect and respectfulCommitmentsupport explicitly and makevisibleReview cadencecheck, change, or remove

Flow

  1. 1Clarify the work context
  2. 2Collect expectations
  3. 3Formulate rules
  4. 4Get commitment
  5. 5Set a review cadence

The runsheet guides execution with 4 phases, timeboxes, 5 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.

Open runsheet

Ideal for

  • Team Kickoffs
  • Retrospectives
  • Distributed Teams

Not good for

  • Formal policy replacement
  • Conflicts without a willingness to align

Deep dive

In detail

Working Agreements follows a clear working logic: clarify the work context, collect expectations, formulate rules, get commitment, and set a review cadence. This turns the method into a visible thinking process rather than only a conversation. Participants move step by step from raw material, observations, or options toward a shared structure. The result is working agreements, team norms, and a review cadence that make decisions, learning, or further planning actionable.

Facilitation

Prepare a clear guiding question, the right information, and a visible workspace. Plan about 45-90 min with 3-12 people and use the format in a facilitated workshop. The method stays lightweight; short timeboxes, visible intermediate results, and a parking lot for open questions help.

Output artifacts
Working AgreementsTeam NormsReview Cadence
Tags
Artifact templates
Working Agreements ChecklistChecklist for concrete, testable team working agreements.
checklist

working-agreements-checklist.md

Checklist for concrete, testable team working agreements.

  • Agreement is phrased in an observable way
  • Applies to everyone on the team
  • Contains no pure statements of intent
  • Conflict case is described
  • Review date is set
  • Owner for maintenance is named

When to choose differently

Short decision aid for existing alternatives.

Team Charter

Statt Working Agreements, wenn ihr Zusammenarbeit, Zielbild und Spielregeln bewusst vereinbaren wollt.

Similar methods

All methods