methodatlas

Product Discovery Decision method

Opportunity Scoring

Prioritizes solution-neutral outcomes through importance and current satisfaction.

Opportunity Scoring evaluates desired outcomes, not features. Importance and satisfaction are collected as top-two-box percentages in the same segment; formula, sample, and uncertainty remain visible.

Core question
Which important user outcomes are currently underserved in the target segment?
Participants
3-6
Time
60-120 min

Opportunity Scoring uses solution-neutral outcome statements plus separate importance and satisfaction ratings. Assessments remain justified and context-bound.

Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
  1. Define outcomes

    Define outcomes

    Break the user job into solution-neutral measurable outcome statements.

  2. Survey segment

    Survey segment

    Recruit the target segment and collect importance and satisfaction separately on the same scale and aggregate top-two-box percentages.

  3. Calculate score

    Calculate score

    Apply the formula consistently and show uncertainty and segment effects.

  4. Prioritise

    Prioritise

    Turn top outcomes into discovery questions without preselecting solutions.

Re-survey for a new segment or market and retain prior versions.

A good fit when

Useful with a validated user job and multiple outcomes; do not treat small convenience samples as market proof.

Ideal for

  • Outcome-driven innovation
  • B2B discovery
  • Roadmap refresh

Not good for

  • Pure feature backlogs without outcome clarity

Outputs

  • opportunity ranking

    opportunity ranking with traceable sources, assumptions, and domain decisions.

  • Decision and review trail

    Owners, dates, and next review for opportunity ranking.

opportunity ranking

Fictional worked example

solution-neutral outcome statements plus separate importance and satisfaction ratings as a precise working structure with a fictional example.

opportunity ranking
OutcomeOutcome statementSegment and sampleImportanceSatisfactionOpportunity and next question
Find an actionWorked exampleMinimise time until an action with owner can be found.86 project leads; ≥2 reviews/month.84% of 86 respondents.37% of 86 respondents.131; next interview on retrieval.
  1. 1. Outcome statement

    Find an action
    Minimise time until an action with owner can be found.
  2. 2. Segment and sample

    Find an action
    86 project leads; ≥2 reviews/month.
  3. 3. Importance

    Find an action
    84% of 86 respondents.
  4. 4. Satisfaction

    Find an action
    37% of 86 respondents.
  5. 5. Opportunity and next question

    Find an action
    131; next interview on retrieval.

The example demonstrates the domain logic of Opportunity Scoring; worksheets remain blank.

Strategyn: Outcome-Driven Innovation

First step

Start with the core question: Which important user outcomes are currently underserved in the target segment?

Open the method guide

Deep dive

Purpose

When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes.

How it works

It scores outcomes with a uniform scoring system and sorts the most interesting gaps to the top. Importance and satisfaction are read together so that underserved needs do not disappear behind louder ideas.

In detail

Opportunity Scoring, shaped by Anthony Ulwick in the context of Outcome-Driven Innovation, asks for each outcome how important it is to customers and how satisfied they are today. The gap between the two becomes the Opportunity Score. Areas with high importance and low satisfaction create the strongest leverage.

Facilitation

Write outcomes in customer language. Define the scale steps clearly. Base ratings on real interviews, not assumptions.

The method guide walks execution through 4 phases, timing, 4 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.

Open method guide

Your perspective

Does this method help with your work?

Your feedback helps shape the next improvements to methodatlas.

Sources and topics

Topics
Artifact templates
Opportunity Scoring: WorksheetPlan Opportunity Scoring around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.
markdown

opportunity-scoring-working-template.md

Plan Opportunity Scoring around its domain steps and the concrete decision question.

Opportunity Scoring: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Full workshop Time: 60 minutes design; survey separate; 45 minutes analysis

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: Validated user job, Outcome statements, Segmented survey data, shared workspace, source links, and decision log.
  • Roles: Research · Product · domain expert · Analytics
  • Advance information: Collect Validated user job, Outcome statements, Segmented survey data in advance and mark open assumptions.
  • Overall time needed: 60 minutes design; survey separate; 45 minutes analysis
  • Setup: Prepare solution-neutral outcome statements plus separate importance and satisfaction ratings visibly and calibrate assessment terms before starting.

Prepare for the work steps

Define outcomes: Define outcomes

  • Validated user job
  • Outcome statements
  • Segmented survey data

Survey segment: Survey segment

  • outcome list
  • Outcome statements
  • Segmented survey data

Calculate score: Calculate score

  • survey data
  • Outcome statements
  • Segmented survey data

Prioritise: Prioritise

  • opportunity scores
  • Outcome statements
  • Segmented survey data

opportunity ranking

OutcomeDirection · measure · contextAudience · n · recruitmentTop-two-box share · n · confidence intervalTop-two-box share · n · confidence intervalI + max(I−S,0) · score · uncertainty
Find an action
  • Find an action: Worked example

Enter only real input, sources, and decisions.

Strategyn: Outcome-Driven Innovation

Define outcomes: Define outcomes

Expected artifact: outcome list

outcome list · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Does every statement contain direction, measure, and context without a solution?

Survey segment: Survey segment

Expected artifact: survey data

survey data · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Are segment, recruitment, and scale documented?

Calculate score: Calculate score

Expected artifact: opportunity scores

opportunity scores · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Are values comparable within the same sample and scale?

Prioritise: Prioritise

Expected artifact: opportunity backlog

opportunity backlog · source · uncertainty · next decision

Entry:

...

  • Does priority remain on the outcome rather than a favourite feature?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/opportunity-scoring/run-sheet

Alternatives and neighbors

Fitting alternatives with decision guidance, followed by other related methods.

All methods
Constraints and origin
MediumWorkshop + async60-120 min

Profile

Method form
Decision method
Participants
3-6
Time
60-120 min
Maturity
Established
Origin
Tony Ulwick
Paper illustration of a branching tree with an outcome at its root, customer opportunities, solution options and small experiment cards.
Next up: Opportunity Solution Tree