methodatlas

Business Strategy Planning tool

VMGS

Connects vision and mission with verifiable goals and chosen strategies.

VMGS connects Vision, Mission, Goals and Strategies: desired future, organisational purpose, measurable goals and chosen routes. Here it is a compact editorial strategy outline related to VMOSA, without claiming a single canonical originator.

Core question
How do our chosen strategies lead through verifiable goals to mission and vision?
Participants
3-12 participants
Time
Several work sessions with research and alignment; 60–120 minutes per section
Paper illustration for VMGS
  1. Vision

    Vision: describe the future

    Describe the desirable future from the perspective of affected people.

  2. Mission

    Mission: bound the contribution

    Define whom the entity serves, its contribution to the vision and what lies outside its remit.

  3. Goals

    Goals: make progress measurable

    State a few outcome goals with baseline, target, deadline, source and owner.

  4. Strategies

    Strategies: choose routes

    Compare alternative routes for each goal and choose a reasoned approach with resources and trade-offs.

  5. Coherence

    Coherence and review

    Trace each strategy back to goal, mission and vision and resolve conflicting commitments.

Review goals and strategic assumptions at agreed dates; deliberately revisit vision and mission when direction changes.

A good fit when

For aligning a team or initiative with decision authority, affected stakeholder perspectives and realistic resources.

Ideal for

  • Strategy workshops
  • Organizational alignment
  • Portfolio direction

Not good for

  • Short-term task planning
  • Feature-level design

Outputs

  • Vision–Mission–Goals–Strategies

    Connected Vision–Mission–Goals–Strategies document with goal metrics, resource decisions, assumptions and review.

  • Agreed strategy with review

    The agreed strategy records the decision, next implementation steps, and review against goal metrics.

VMGS· worksheet

Fictional example

VMGS connects Vision, Mission, Goals and Strategies: desired future, organisational purpose, measurable goals and chosen routes. Here it is a compact editorial strategy outline related to VMOSA, without claiming a single canonical originator.

Vision

What future state do affected people seek?

Fictional: adults in the neighbourhood can keep learning regardless of working hours.

Mission

For whom do we contribute what, and what boundaries apply?

Our learning association offers flexible introductory courses to working adults; accredited vocational qualifications are out of scope.

Goals

Give baseline, target, deadline, data source and owner per outcome goal.

Increase completion from 50% to 70% by 30 June; course register, owner Lea. Baseline: previous two cohorts.

Strategies

Which approaches do we choose per goal, why, with what resources and trade-offs?

Pilot asynchronous modules with a weekly office hour; assumption: flexible timing reduces dropout. Two instructors run one pilot instead of three new in-person courses.

Decision and review

Who decides, which assumptions are reviewed when and what follows from variance?

The board approves pilot resources; after six weeks Lea reviews participation and dropout reasons, then completion at cohort end.

All example details are fictional and illustrate the application.

University of Kansas: VMOSA

First step

Define scope and horizon; collect needs, baseline data, resources and existing commitments.

Open the method guide

Deep dive

Purpose

VMGS arranges vision, mission, goals, and strategies into a clear guiding logic. Direction, purpose, and priorities are connected so teams can decide more coherently.

How it works

First the team formulates the vision as a target picture and sharpens the mission as its purpose. Then goals and fitting strategies are derived and checked for coherence and measurability. What remains is a compact strategy form that gives orientation for several initiatives.

In detail

VMGS works because it cleanly separates vision, mission, goals, and strategy as different levels of direction. The approach becomes valuable when each level keeps its own distinct meaning while still visibly feeding into the next. In daily practice, linguistic precision, realistic goal horizons, and recognizable consequences for priorities matter, so guiding statements turn into genuine everyday orientation.

Facilitation

Start with the question of which decisions should become easier once vision and mission are formulated more clearly. You should pay particular attention when goals already contain operational measures or the strategy just repeats slogans; then the separation of levels needs to be redone. Close with a few reference sentences and a plan for how the wording appears in portfolio, communication, and reviews.

The method guide walks execution through 5 phases, timing, 5 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.

Open method guide

Your perspective

Does this method help with your work?

Your feedback helps shape the next improvements to methodatlas.

Sources and topics

Topics
Artifact templates
Strategy BriefCompact briefing for strategic context, target state, priorities, and non-goals.
markdown

strategy-brief-markdown.md

Compact briefing for strategic context, target state, priorities, and non-goals.

Strategy Brief

Context

Why is this strategic clarification needed now?

Target state

What should be different in 6-12 months?

Priorities

  1. ...
  2. ...
  3. ...

Non-goals

  • ...

Metrics

  • North Star Metric:
  • Guardrail Metrics:

Risks

  • ...

Decisions

Which decisions should follow from this?

VMGS: WorksheetDefine scope and horizon; collect needs, baseline data, resources and existing commitments.
markdown

vmgs-working-template.md

Define scope and horizon; collect needs, baseline data, resources and existing commitments.

VMGS: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Complete cycle Time: Several work sessions with research and alignment; 60–120 minutes per section

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: Four-part document, evidence of needs, baseline metrics, resource constraints and strategic options.
  • Roles: Strategy owner, implementation owners, affected stakeholders and data experts.
  • Advance information: Define scope and horizon; collect needs, baseline data, resources and existing commitments.
  • Overall time needed: Several work sessions with research and alignment; 60–120 minutes per section
  • Setup: Prepare four linked sections with evidence and open assumptions; connect goals and strategies through stable references.

Prepare for the work steps

Vision: Vision: describe the future

  • Needs perspectives
  • Time horizon

Mission: Mission: bound the contribution

  • Vision
  • Capabilities and mandate

Goals: Goals: make progress measurable

  • Mission
  • Baseline metrics

Strategies: Strategies: choose routes

  • Goals
  • Options and resources

Coherence: Coherence and review

  • VMGS draft
  • Decision makers

VMGS· worksheet

Vision

What future state do affected people seek?

...

Mission

For whom do we contribute what, and what boundaries apply?

...

Goals

Give baseline, target, deadline, data source and owner per outcome goal.

...

Strategies

Which approaches do we choose per goal, why, with what resources and trade-offs?

...

Decision and review

Who decides, which assumptions are reviewed when and what follows from variance?

...

Answer the prompts with your own information. Explicitly mark unknowns and assumptions.

University of Kansas: VMOSA

Vision: Vision: describe the future

Expected artifact: Future picture

Does the vision describe a desirable state?

Entry:

...

  • Does the vision describe a desirable state?

Mission: Mission: bound the contribution

Expected artifact: Mission

Is the contribution clear and distinct from the future picture?

Entry:

...

  • Is the contribution clear and distinct from the future picture?

Goals: Goals: make progress measurable

Expected artifact: Outcome goals

Can progress be verified clearly for every goal?

Entry:

...

  • Can progress be verified clearly for every goal?

Strategies: Strategies: choose routes

Expected artifact: Chosen approaches

Is each approach linked to a goal and causal assumption?

Entry:

...

  • Is each approach linked to a goal and causal assumption?

Coherence: Coherence and review

Expected artifact: Strategy and review

Are contribution, resources and review clear for each approach?

Entry:

...

  • Are contribution, resources and review clear for each approach?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/vmgs/run-sheet

Alternatives and neighbors

Fitting alternatives with decision guidance, followed by other related methods.

All methods
Constraints and origin
MediumWorkshop2-4 h

Profile

Method form
Planning tool
Participants
3-12
Time
2-4 h
Maturity
Established
Origin
Praxisgemeinschaft
A paper-based illustration representing OKRs with its core stages and visible working result.
Next up: OKRs