methodatlas

Agile Decision method

ROAM Board

Assigns every relevant risk a treatment as Resolved, Owned, Accepted, or Mitigated.

ROAM is a collaborative risk-treatment practice for planning and review. Owned is an interim state with accountability, Accepted requires an authorised decision, Mitigated requires a concrete plan, and Resolved requires evidence that the concern has ended.

Core question
How will each relevant risk be treated, and what must happen before the next review?
Participants
3-15
Time
20-40 min initial, dann laufend

Owned is not done. Accepted needs an authorised risk acceptor; Mitigated needs an action and residual uncertainty.

Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
  1. Prepare

    Qualify risks for ROAM

    Provide a bounded, understandable list of relevant risks with consequence and context.

  2. Decide

    ROAM every risk

    Choose the appropriate treatment and record the decision rationale.

  3. Commit

    Add ownership and review dates

    Make open risks actionable with owners, actions, acceptance authority, and the next review.

  4. Review

    Update status from evidence

    Review risks regularly, justify transitions, and close completed cards traceably.

Review Owned and Mitigated risks at the agreed cadence; change status only with new evidence or an executed decision.

A good fit when

Useful after risk identification, especially for cross-team planning risks. It does not replace risk assessment or a detailed register.

Ideal for

  • PI planning follow-up
  • Program reviews
  • Cross-team risks

Not good for

  • Detailed risk assessment with probabilities

Outputs

  • ROAM board

    Risks with an explicit treatment and documented rationale.

  • Review list

    Open owners, actions, dates, acceptances, and status triggers.

ROAM Board

Fictional worked example

Four treatment states with status-specific required information.

Resolved

Test environment capacity

Additional capacity confirmed; risk ended on 14 June.

Owned

Certificate approval delayed

Clarification blocked

Owner Security; escalation by 21 June; treatment still undecided.

Accepted

One-day shipping delay

Business owner accepted on 12 June; reconsider at >1 day or >5% of orders.

Mitigated

Identity provider outage

Fallback tested; residual switch-over risk up to five minutes; review 30 September.

Resolved
Evidence shows the concern has ended; record rationale and date.
Owned
An owner investigates; next action and date are required.
Accepted
An authorised person accepts residual risk with rationale and trigger.
Mitigated
A treatment reduces likelihood or impact; keep residual risk visible.

U.S. Department of Commerce Agile Framework

First step

Include only concrete risk scenarios and clarify the required ROAM decision for each.

Open the method guide

Deep dive

Purpose

When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.

How it works

It keeps tasks on an easily movable board and shows where work is stuck or can move forward. This makes flow control in daily work more visible than in static lists, especially when demand keeps changing.

In detail

The ROAM Board is a simple state tracker often used in scaled agile after PI planning. Resolved means done, Owned means deliberately monitored with an owner, Accepted means consciously accepted without action, and Mitigated means active countermeasure. Each risk stays visible until it is Resolved or explicitly Accepted.

Facilitation

Keep the definitions of the four categories visible. Allow only one bucket per risk so clarity remains high. Set a review cadence, for example weekly.

The method guide walks execution through 4 phases, timing, 4 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.

Open method guide

Your perspective

Does this method help with your work?

Your feedback helps shape the next improvements to methodatlas.

Sources and topics

Topics
Artifact templates
ROAM Board: WorksheetSet up the board once and establish a recurring review practice.
markdown

roam-board-working-template.md

Set up the board once and establish a recurring review practice.

ROAM Board: Worksheet

Question

To be confirmed

Desired outcome

To be confirmed

Scope

Establish ROAM practice Time: Ongoing practice with 10–20 minutes per review

Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.

Preparation for this scope

Method setup

  • Materials: Four-column board, prioritised risk list, planning objectives, owner directory, and review calendar.
  • Roles: Facilitator or RTE, risk owners, affected teams, subject experts, and authorised risk acceptor.
  • Advance information: Prepare risks with consequences, current assessment, and existing treatments.
  • Overall time needed: 20–40 minutes initially; 10–20 minutes per review.
  • Setup: Display column criteria and required fields for owners, dates, treatments, and acceptance.

Prepare for the work steps

Prepare: Qualify risks for ROAM

  • Current risks from planning or register
  • Objectives and affected dependencies
  • Existing assessment or urgency

Decide: ROAM every risk

  • Qualified risks
  • Response options and decision authority
  • People with risk and delivery knowledge

Commit: Add ownership and review dates

  • ROAM board
  • Responsibilities
  • Review cadence and escalation path

Review: Update status from evidence

  • Current ROAM board
  • New evidence and treatment results
  • Changed objectives or dependencies

ROAM Board

Resolved

...

Owned

...

Accepted

...

Mitigated

...

Working policies

Resolved ...

Owned ...

Accepted ...

Mitigated ...

U.S. Department of Commerce Agile Framework

Prepare: Qualify risks for ROAM

Expected artifact: Qualified risk list

Risk scenario · consequence · context · urgency

Entry:

...

  • Is every item a risk rather than a task or issue?
  • Is the affected objective clear?

Decide: ROAM every risk

Expected artifact: ROAM assignment

Category · rationale · residual uncertainty

Entry:

...

  • Can the category be traced to a criterion?
  • Is Owned kept distinct from Mitigated and Resolved?

Commit: Add ownership and review dates

Expected artifact: Actionable board

Owner · action · date · evidence · acceptance

Entry:

...

  • Can every open card be actively tracked to the next review?
  • Is acceptance documented by an authorised person?

Review: Update status from evidence

Expected artifact: Versioned risk picture

Status history · new evidence · escalations

Entry:

...

  • Does every status change have a clear trigger?
  • Are overdue Owned risks visibly escalated?

Open questions and next steps

...

Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/roam-board/run-sheet

Alternatives and neighbors

Fitting alternatives with decision guidance, followed by other related methods.

All methods
Constraints and origin
LowWorkshop + async20-40 min initial, dann laufend

Profile

Method form
Decision method
Participants
3-15
Time
20-40 min initial, dann laufend
Maturity
Established
Origin
SAFe Community
Paper illustration of an activity-role table with clear RACI assignments and one highlighted accountable role per activity.
Next up: RACI Matrix