The method helps clarify options, criteria, and risks concretely. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Radar Map, Capability Scores, and Action Areas.
Radar
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by defining dimensions, setting a scoring scale, and deriving action areas.
Which position on the radar most honestly reflects each item's current maturity and organization-wide recommendation?
The team follows the steps: define dimensions, set a scoring scale, evaluate items or capabilities, visualize the radar, and derive action areas. Each step is captured visibly. At the end, a Radar Map, Capability Scores, and Action Areas are available so decisions, tests, or actions can follow directly.
Visual orientation
Method sketch for a quick mental model.
Flow
- 1Define dimensions
- 2Set scoring scale
- 3Evaluate items or capabilities
- 4Visualize the radar
- 5Derive action areas
The runsheet guides execution with 5 phases, timeboxes, 5 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.
Open runsheetIdeal for
- Capability reviews
- Technology radar
- Portfolio conversations
Not good for
- Exact measurement without a scoring model
- Single decisions without a comparison set
Deep dive
Radar follows a clear working logic: define dimensions, set a scoring scale, evaluate items or capabilities, visualize the radar, and derive action areas. This turns the method into a visible thinking process rather than only a conversation. The participants move step by step from raw material, observations, or options toward a shared structure. As a result, a Radar Map, Capability Scores, and Action Areas support decisions, learning, or further planning.
Prepare a clear guiding question, the right information, and a visible workspace. Plan about 1-2 h with 2-10 people and use the format either in a workshop or asynchronously. The facilitation needs visible structure and preparation; short timeboxes, visible intermediate results, and a parking lot for open questions help.
Radar Working TemplateCompact working template for Radar with dimensions, scores, evidence, and action areas.spreadsheet
radar-working-template.md
Compact working template for Radar with dimensions, scores, evidence, and action areas.
Radar Working Template
Goal
Compare capabilities, technologies, or topics on radar rings and derive clear action areas.
Context
When and for what do we use this method?
Input
Which data, observations, decisions, or materials are available?
Working area
- Dimensions:
- Scoring scale:
- Items or capabilities:
- Evidence:
- Action areas:
Output artifacts
- Radar map:
- Capability notes:
- Action backlog:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, and success signal.
When to choose differently
Short decision aid for existing alternatives.
Statt Radar, wenn ihr nicht Reifegrade einordnet, sondern Optionen mit Gewichtung und Begründung gegeneinander auswählt.
Similar methods
All methodsClarifies options, criteria, and risks by framing the central question, recording the main claim, and marking weak spots.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by defining the decision question, collecting options and conditions, and discussing the best path.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by collecting rough options, consolidating them, and creating a comparable shortlist.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by delimiting the decision, assigning RAPID roles, and documenting the decision and action steps.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by framing the decision, collecting options, and documenting trade-offs and the decision.
Turns options, criteria, and risks into a tangible result by defining the question and panel, querying in the first round, and deriving the outcome in the next round.