The method helps clarify backlog, sprint work, and team flow in a concrete way. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery capability. The result is captured as an affinity size map, grouped estimates, and unclear items.
Affinity Estimation
Turns backlog, sprint work, and team flow into a tangible result by preparing items as cards, building a relative size axis, and clarifying outliers and uncertainties.
How can the team place the items in a reliable relative size order and label the resulting groups?
The team follows the steps: prepare items as cards, build a relative size axis, sort items silently, assign size labels to clusters, and clarify outliers and uncertainties. Each step is captured visibly. At the end, an affinity size map, grouped estimates, and unclear items are available so decisions, tests, or actions can follow directly.
Visual orientation
Method sketch for a quick mental model.
Flow
- 1Prepare items as cards
- 2Build a relative size axis
- 3Sort items silently
- 4Assign size labels to clusters
- 5Clarify outliers and uncertainties
The runsheet guides execution with 5 phases, timeboxes, 5 pitfalls, and clear stop criteria.
Open runsheetIdeal for
- Large backlogs
- Release planning
- Team calibration
Not good for
- Single high-risk items
- Very unclear requirements
- Detailed cost estimation
Deep dive
Affinity Estimation transfers affinity grouping into estimation. Instead of discussing each item at length, the team sorts many cards relative to one another from small to large. Then the clusters are labeled with sizes such as T-shirt sizes or story point buckets. Discussion happens mainly where items are unexpectedly placed or where several people have clearly different assumptions.
Prepare all items as cards and a visible size axis. Let the group sort silently first to avoid long debates. Discuss only outliers, unclear items, and cluster boundaries, then document assumptions and slicing candidates.
Affinity Estimation Working TemplateCompact working template for Affinity Estimation with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.canvas
affinity-estimation-working-template.md
Compact working template for Affinity Estimation with context, input, output artifacts, and next step.
Affinity Estimation Canvas
Context
What is this method used for?
Core question
Which question should be answered at the end?
Input
Which data, observations, or materials are available?
Working area
- Area 1:
- Area 2:
- Area 3:
- Relationships / patterns:
Output artifacts
- Affinity Size Map:
- Grouped Estimates:
- Unclear Items:
Open questions
- ...
Next step
Owner, date, success signal.
When to choose differently
Short decision aid for existing alternatives.
Statt Affinity Estimation, wenn ihr Schätzungen relativ kalibrieren wollt und gemeinsame Annahmen offenlegen möchtet.
Statt Affinity Estimation, wenn ihr Schätzungen mit mehreren Expertenrunden belastbarer machen wollt.
Similar methods
All methodsMoves backlog, sprint work, and team flow toward a concrete result through "prepare buckets and scale", "place reference items", and "flag large or unclear items".
Turns backlog, sprint work, and team flow into a tangible result by presenting the item, clarifying questions, and discussing deviations before estimating again.
Statt Affinity Estimation, wenn ihr Schätzungen relativ kalibrieren wollt und gemeinsame Annahmen offenlegen möchtet.
Moves backlog, sprint work, and team flow toward a concrete result through "choose reference stories", "define the scale", and "interpret velocity only within the team".
Turns backlog, sprint work, and team flow into a tangible result by explaining the scale, choosing reference items, and marking large items.
Moves backlog, sprint work, and team flow toward a concrete result through "explain the ideal day unit", "calibrate with a reference item", and "do not confuse it with calendar days".
Product Backlog, Sprint Goal, Increment, and retrospective loops create a repeatable cadence for complex product work.