Moves incident response into a shared thread, connects alerts with commands, and keeps decisions traceable.
Core question: Which operational action benefits from shared visibility, and what controls prevent misuse?
Operating practiceMethod form: Operating practice. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
Ongoing
2-20
Details
EngineeringCategory: Engineering. Describes the method's domain of use.
Describes the preferred default path for common use cases and adds templates, checks, and exceptions.
Core question: How does a team reliably move from entry to an operable result in the supported standard case?
Planning toolMethod form: Planning tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
1-3 Tage Setup, laufend
2-8
Details
EngineeringCategory: Engineering. Describes the method's domain of use.
Narrows down the fault space and symptoms step by step until only a few hypotheses and targeted tests remain.
Core question: Which smallest subsystem contains the fault when candidates are systematically excluded through discriminating tests?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
30-180 min
1-6
Details
EngineeringCategory: Engineering. Describes the method's domain of use.
Moves technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps toward a concrete result through "formulate the goal clearly", "derive probing questions for each goal", and "set the review cadence".
Core question: Which questions must be answered to assess the defined goal from the chosen viewpoint, and which metrics provide those answers?
Planning toolMethod form: Planning tool. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.WorkshopFormat: workshop. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
90-180 min
3-6
Details
Knowledge ModelingCategory: Knowledge Modeling. Describes the method's domain of use.
Ontology work is organized as a scenario-based process for reuse, collaboration, evaluation, and long-term maintenance.
Core question: Which NeOn scenarios and activities lead from our sources to a maintainable ontology network?
Process modelMethod form: Process model. Describes how this method is used in practice.HighComplexity: high. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
Mehrere Wochen bis Monate
2-10
Details
ArchitectureCategory: Architecture. Describes the method's domain of use.
Developers try a preliminary technical design through typical tasks, showing what makes it easy or difficult to use.
Core question: Can developers accomplish their important tasks using this preliminary design?
Analysis methodMethod form: Analysis method. Describes how this method is used in practice.MediumComplexity: medium. Estimates preparation, facilitation effort, and method confidence needed.Workshop + asyncFormat: workshop or async. Shows whether the method works in a workshop, asynchronously, or both.
2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional