methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Purposedifferent
When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30–60 min per interview
Participantsdifferent
10-501 participant per interview
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesInterview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary
Tags1 shared
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Hypothesis Prioritization Canvas
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview
Paper illustration of Opportunity Scoring with its method-specific working model.
Product Discovery
Opportunity Scoring