The question bounds topic, purpose and perspective.
Concept Mapping
A practical method guide: clarify prerequisites and materials, understand the complete process, and look up outputs, pitfalls, and stop criteria.
Prerequisite
What needs to be finished first
Sources or domain experts can test concepts and relationships.
Preparation
What needs to be ready before start
Large workspace, focus question, source material, concept cards and markers for linking phrases.
People with domain knowledge, a facilitator and a documentation owner.
Focus question, context and reliable sources or observations.
60–120 minutes
Prepare the workspace from general to specific and a parking area for unconnected concepts.
Core question
The one question this method answers
Which concepts and propositions answer our focus question?
Flow
Phases with goal, actions, output and pitfall
A Concept Map answers a focus question with hierarchically arranged concepts. Labelled links form readable propositions, while cross-links reveal relationships between knowledge domains.
Concept Map · Worksheet
Fictional example
The worksheet separates focus, concepts, propositions, cross-links and revision.
Focus question
What open question should the map answer, in what context?
How is a reliable course-booking confirmation produced?
Concepts
Which 15 to 25 terms are central, and which are more general or specific?
Booking request, participation rules, capacity, reservation, confirmation.
Propositions
Which concepts connect through what linking phrase to form a meaningful statement?
Booking request is checked against participation rules.
Cross-links
Which relationship across branches adds explanatory meaning?
Corporate seat limit constrains capacity.
Revision
Which propositions are uncertain, redundant or open? Which source or person can resolve them?
Expiry of unpaid reservations is open; Operations resolves by Friday.
The document describes the parts; build the map spatially with directed, labelled edges.
- 1
Focus
Refine the focus question

Goal
Clear focus question
Inputs for this step
- Learning or decision goal
- Domain boundary
Actions
- Write an open focus question with context.
- Define terms and exclude unrelated subtopics.
Output
Focus question
Question, context and purpose
Quality check
Can the completed map be read as an answer?
Pitfall
The heading only names a topic. Turn the topic into an answerable focus question.
Timing: 10–15 minutes
- 2
Concepts
Collect key concepts

Goal
Concept parking lot
Inputs for this step
- Focus question
- Sources and domain knowledge
Actions
- List roughly 15 to 25 central concepts as concise labels.
- Resolve duplicates and separate concepts from examples or complete claims.
Output
Ordered concept list
Short, unambiguous labels
Quality check
Does each card name a concept rather than a statement? Are the most inclusive concepts present?
Pitfall
Cards contain sentences or activities. Reduce them to the key concept and express the relation later as a linking phrase.
Timing: 15–20 minutes
- 3
Hierarchy
Build the hierarchy

Goal
Provisional knowledge structure
Inputs for this step
- Concept list
- Focus question
Actions
- Place the most inclusive concepts first.
- Group subordinate concepts and leave uncertain cards in the parking lot.
Output
Concept hierarchy
Levels and clusters
Quality check
Does placement express a meaningful generalisation? Does the hierarchy remain tied to the focus question?
Pitfall
The map is only sorted as a process sequence. Build a knowledge hierarchy; use sequence only when it carries domain meaning.
Timing: 15–25 minutes
- 4
Propositions
Write propositions

Goal
Meaningful Concept Map
Inputs for this step
- Concept hierarchy
- Domain claims
Actions
- Label every connection with a verb or short phrase.
- Read concept A plus linking phrase plus concept B as a complete claim.
Output
Labelled propositions
Concept, linking phrase, concept
Quality check
Does every connection form a meaningful statement? Is edge direction explicit?
Pitfall
Lines indicate proximity but no meaning. Add a precise linking phrase or remove the line.
Timing: 20–35 minutes
- 5
Cross-links
Test cross-links

Goal
Integrated, reviewed map
Inputs for this step
- Labelled map
- Sources and questions
Actions
- Look for explanatory relationships between branches.
- Correct unclear propositions, remove redundancy and mark open questions.
Output
Revised Concept Map
Cross-links, open questions and version
Quality check
Does each cross-link create new meaning? Are uncertain statements visibly marked?
Pitfall
Extra cross-links increase density without clarity. Keep only relationships that can be stated as relevant propositions.
Timing: 15–25 minutes
Artifact
What comes out at the end
Sketch: what the artifact looks like
Versioned Concept Map with focus question, hierarchy, labelled propositions, cross-links and open questions.
Include focus question and date in the title; retain major restructures as separate versions.
- CmapTools
- Whiteboard with cards and labelled edges
- Diagramming tool with editable linking phrases
concept-mapping-working-template.md
Write a focus question that defines the purpose and boundary of the map.
Concept Mapping: Worksheet
Question
To be confirmed
Desired outcome
To be confirmed
Scope
Complete workflow Time: 60–120 minutes
Complete this worksheet on paper or in your own document during the work.
Preparation for this scope
Method setup
- Materials: Large workspace, focus question, source material, concept cards and markers for linking phrases.
- Roles: People with domain knowledge, a facilitator and a documentation owner.
- Advance information: Focus question, context and reliable sources or observations.
- Overall time needed: 60–120 minutes
- Setup: Prepare the workspace from general to specific and a parking area for unconnected concepts.
Prepare for the work steps
Focus: Refine the focus question
- Learning or decision goal
- Domain boundary
Concepts: Collect key concepts
- Focus question
- Sources and domain knowledge
Hierarchy: Build the hierarchy
- Concept list
- Focus question
Propositions: Write propositions
- Concept hierarchy
- Domain claims
Cross-links: Test cross-links
- Labelled map
- Sources and questions
Concept Map · Worksheet
Focus question
What open question should the map answer, in what context?
...
Concepts
Which 15 to 25 terms are central, and which are more general or specific?
...
Propositions
Which concepts connect through what linking phrase to form a meaningful statement?
...
Cross-links
Which relationship across branches adds explanatory meaning?
...
Revision
Which propositions are uncertain, redundant or open? Which source or person can resolve them?
...
Leave examples blank. Record every proposition as concept, linking phrase, concept.
Novak & Cañas: Theory Underlying Concept Maps
Focus: Refine the focus question
Expected artifact: Focus question
Question, context and purpose
Entry:
...
- Can the completed map be read as an answer?
Concepts: Collect key concepts
Expected artifact: Ordered concept list
Short, unambiguous labels
Entry:
...
- Does each card name a concept rather than a statement?
- Are the most inclusive concepts present?
Hierarchy: Build the hierarchy
Expected artifact: Concept hierarchy
Levels and clusters
Entry:
...
- Does placement express a meaningful generalisation?
- Does the hierarchy remain tied to the focus question?
Propositions: Write propositions
Expected artifact: Labelled propositions
Concept, linking phrase, concept
Entry:
...
- Does every connection form a meaningful statement?
- Is edge direction explicit?
Cross-links: Test cross-links
Expected artifact: Revised Concept Map
Cross-links, open questions and version
Entry:
...
- Does each cross-link create new meaning?
- Are uncertain statements visibly marked?
Open questions and next steps
...
Method guide: https://methodatlas.meierhoff-systems.de/en/methods/concept-mapping/run-sheet
Example output
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example for orientation. Counts and timings describe this case and are not universal requirements.
concept-mapping-beispiel.md
Concrete filled scenario, fictional example
Fictional example
Focus question: How is a reliable course-booking confirmation produced?
Propositions: “Booking request is checked against participation rules.” “Participation rules include capacity and corporate seat limit.” “Valid check creates reservation.” “Reservation triggers confirmation.”
Cross-link: “Corporate seat limit constrains capacity” connects contract logic and seat management.
Open question: When does an unpaid reservation expire? The relationship remains marked until resolved.
Pitfalls
Recognize symptoms and steer against them
Quick overview, the full text is in the matching phase in the flow
- Refine the focus questionThe heading only names a topic.View in phase
- Collect key conceptsCards contain sentences or activities.View in phase
- Build the hierarchyThe map is only sorted as a process sequence.View in phase
- Write propositionsLines indicate proximity but no meaning.View in phase
- Test cross-linksExtra cross-links increase density without clarity.View in phase
Refine the focus question
The heading only names a topic.
Turn the topic into an answerable focus question.
Collect key concepts
Cards contain sentences or activities.
Reduce them to the key concept and express the relation later as a linking phrase.
Build the hierarchy
The map is only sorted as a process sequence.
Build a knowledge hierarchy; use sequence only when it carries domain meaning.
Write propositions
Lines indicate proximity but no meaning.
Add a precise linking phrase or remove the line.
Test cross-links
Extra cross-links increase density without clarity.
Keep only relationships that can be stated as relevant propositions.
Stop criteria
When to pause, resolve prerequisites, or choose another approach
Finished the method guide?
Go to the profile for purpose, similar methods, and sources or continue to the next method in the catalog.

