View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Wizard of Oz Test | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears. | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-10 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 Nutzer | 5-10 Interviews | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk List | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes |
Tagsno overlap | PrototypeValidationMVP | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






