View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Wizard of Oz Test |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a new experience would still be too expensive to automate for real, it simulates the outcome behind the scenes. It checks user reaction and value before the technology disappears. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-10 Tage | 4-5 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 Nutzer | 5-8 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Prototype Learnings, Manual Effort Notes, Risk List | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tags1 shared | PrototypeValidationMVP | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
