View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Value Chain AnalysisArchitecture Decision RecordARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Value Chain Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Value Chain Analysis shows where value is created, costs accrue, and differentiation becomes possible along the process. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a value-chain map and lever list. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 15-45 min | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Value Chain Map, Lever List | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyBusiness modelDiagnosisAnalysis | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
