methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration for Option Framing.
Decision Making
Option Framing
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question.
Complexitydifferent
LowMedium
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interview3-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryOption Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs
Tagsno overlap
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Decision Framing Workshop.
Decision Making
Decision Framing Workshop
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration for Opportunity Interview
Product Discovery
Opportunity Interview