View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 1-4 Wochen | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 3-10 Kunden | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
