View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Timeline | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a project, incident, or change process is only remembered in fragments, Timeline brings the sequence back into a readable form. It makes turning points, precursors, and after-effects recognizable over the course of time. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 60-90 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-6 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Timeline, Milestones, Insight Notes | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | TimelineFacilitationSequence | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






