View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Three-Point Estimation | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring | ![]() Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 10-30 min je Item | 60-120 min | 1-3 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-6 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | CustomerOutcomesNeeds |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






