methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Team Charter.
Facilitation
Team Charter
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Stakeholder Mapping
Facilitation
Stakeholder Mapping
Purposedifferent
When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h45-90 min60–90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-122-52-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Team Charter, Working Norms, Role NotesA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisStakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCollaboration
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of Power-Interest Grid with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Facilitation
Power Interest Grid
Paper illustration of Stakeholder Salience Model with its method-specific working model.
Facilitation
Stakeholder Salience Model