View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Agile Planning Poker |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 2-5 min je Item | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-9 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tags1 shared | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam | TeamCollaborationAgile |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
