methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend90-180 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus Stakeholder4-125-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Team API DocumentDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tags1 shared
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods

Often compared together

Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.

Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration of Stakeholder Salience Model with its method-specific working model.
Facilitation
Stakeholder Salience Model