View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 1-4 Wochen | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-10 Kunden | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
