View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team API |  Delivery Communication Plan |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 2-6 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
