View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy SWOT Analysis |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | SWOT Analysis arranges strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats into a compact picture of the situation. It keeps internal capabilities and external influences separate before strategic options emerge from them. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 15-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-3 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | SWOT matrix, Strategic options, Action list | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisMarketPositioning | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
