View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Surveys | ![]() UX Research Tree Testing | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 3-14 Tage | 1-2 Tage | 45-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 50+ | Based on research question | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking |
Tagsno overlap | QuantitativeResearchValidation | Information architectureNavigationFindability | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






