View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 4-12 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
