View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Starfish Retrospective | ![]() Facilitation Team Charter | ![]() Agile Sprint Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-12 | Scrum Team |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Improvement actions, Team agreements |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






