View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 2-4 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tags1 shared | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
