View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






