View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Decision Making DACI |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60–90 min | 15-45 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-3 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
