View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Sprint RetrospectiveArchitecture Decision RecordStrategic, Tactical and Operational Planning
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Sprint Retrospective | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Up to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter | 15-45 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | Scrum Team | 1-3 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Improvement actions, Team agreements | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementLearning | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | CadenceGovernanceExecution |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






