View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-15 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Spotify Model Map, Action List | ROAM Board, Owner List | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tags1 shared | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
