View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 2-4 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 5-15 | 3-8 | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tagsno overlap | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
