View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Agile Three Amigos |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 15-30 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
