View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 90-180 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 5-15 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
