View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Agile Scrum | ![]() Business Strategy Strategy Execution Loop |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a team needs to work in a fixed delivery rhythm, it stabilizes cadence, responsibility, and feedback loops. It makes collaboration reliable across sprint boundaries. | The Strategy Execution Loop helps avoid treating strategy as a one-off document. It makes visible how strategic decisions are turned into objectives, initiatives, operational work, measurement, and learning. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-4 Wochen je Sprint, laufend | Initial 3-6 h, then monthly or quarterly reviews |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-10 (Scrum Team) | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, Increment, Sprint Goal | Execution Loop, Review Cadence, Strategic Learning Log |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | AgileIterationCadence | ExecutionCadenceLearningGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






