View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
