View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  UX Research Personas |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When target groups stay too vague and teams talk about the same people differently, personas create a shared, solid picture of usage. Condensed profiles make needs, contexts, and differences tangible enough for decisions. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1-3 Tage | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | Internes Team | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Persona Profiles, Needs Summary, Scenario Notes | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | ResearchCustomerSynthesis | AgileDiscoveryDelivery |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
