View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() Operations PDCA Cycle | ![]() Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-8 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






