View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
