View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Specification by Example | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping | ![]() Agile Three Amigos |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-4 h | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-10 | 3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | JourneyServiceService design | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






