View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Agile Affinity Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 45-90 min | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | AutonomyRolesTeam | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
