View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Specification by Example |  Product Discovery Context Canvas |  Domain Modeling Domain Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min pro Feature | 45-90 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-10 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.
